Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: ✨ Initial graphql federation: users application #14

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Nov 8, 2024

Conversation

zhumeisongsong
Copy link
Owner

@zhumeisongsong zhumeisongsong commented Nov 8, 2024

Related #8

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced user management capabilities with the addition of a UsersModule, UsersService, and UsersResolver.
    • Added GraphQL support for user-related queries and mutations.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated spell checker settings to recognize "nestjs" as a valid term.
  • Tests

    • Implemented test suites for UsersService and UsersResolver to ensure proper functionality and error handling.
  • Chores

    • Updated dependencies to improve compatibility and performance, including significant changes to Apollo-related packages.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several changes to a NestJS application, including the addition of a UsersModule, UsersService, and UsersResolver, which facilitate user management through GraphQL. A new User model is defined, and tests for the resolver and service are added. Additionally, the .vscode/settings.json file is updated to include the term "nestjs" for spell checking, and the package.json file is modified to adjust dependencies, focusing on Apollo-related packages and updating existing ones.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.vscode/settings.json Added "cSpell.words": ["nestjs"] to configure spell checker.
apps/users-application/src/app/app.module.ts Updated imports in AppModule to include UsersModule.
apps/users-application/src/users/models/user.model.ts Introduced User class with fields id and name for GraphQL.
apps/users-application/src/users/users.module.ts Added UsersModule class for GraphQL functionality using Apollo Federation.
apps/users-application/src/users/users.resolver.ts Created UsersResolver with methods getUser and resolveReference.
apps/users-application/src/users/users.resolver.spec.ts Added test suite for UsersResolver covering initialization and method tests.
apps/users-application/src/users/users.service.ts Introduced UsersService with method findById for user retrieval.
apps/users-application/src/users/users.service.spec.ts Added test suite for UsersService focusing on findById method.
package.json Updated dependencies and devDependencies, adding Apollo-related packages.

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

🐰 In the garden where I play,
New modules bloom, bright as day.
With users now, we can create,
GraphQL queries that are first-rate!
Spell check's happy, no more fuss,
Hopping forward, join us! 🌼

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@github-actions[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 29 minutes and 48 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c0e9fe3 and aab9433.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@zhumeisongsong zhumeisongsong changed the title Feature/initial graphql federation ✨ Initial graphql federation Nov 8, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 8

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
apps/users-application/src/users/models/user.model.ts (1)

5-11: Consider enhancing the User model with additional fields.

The current implementation with id and name fields is correct and follows GraphQL best practices. However, consider if additional fields might be needed for a complete user model:

  • email (for user identification)
  • createdAt/updatedAt (for tracking)
  • status (for user state management)

Example enhancement:

 export class User {
   @Field(() => ID)
   id: number;

   @Field()
   name: string;
+
+  @Field()
+  email: string;
+
+  @Field(() => Date)
+  createdAt: Date;
+
+  @Field(() => Date)
+  updatedAt: Date;
+
+  @Field()
+  status: string;
 }
apps/users-application/src/users/users.resolver.ts (3)

6-8: Consider adding readonly modifier to the constructor parameter.

While the implementation is correct, adding the readonly modifier would better enforce immutability.

-  constructor(private usersService: UsersService) {}
+  constructor(private readonly usersService: UsersService) {}

15-21: Improve type safety for reference resolution.

  1. Consider creating a dedicated interface for the reference parameter.
  2. Handle null case explicitly for GraphQL compatibility.
+  interface Reference {
+    __typename: string;
+    id: number;
+  }
+
   @ResolveReference()
-  resolveReference(reference: {
-    __typename: string;
-    id: number;
-  }): User | undefined {
+  resolveReference(reference: Reference): User | null {
     return this.usersService.findById(reference.id);
   }

6-22: Consider additional federation configuration.

For a complete federation setup, consider:

  1. Adding @Key decorator to the User model to specify the entity's primary key
  2. Implementing __resolveType if this service will be resolving interfaces or unions
  3. Adding health checks for federation gateway integration
apps/users-application/src/users/users.module.ts (2)

14-20: Consider adding federation-specific configurations.

For a more robust federation setup, consider adding these configurations:

 GraphQLModule.forRoot<ApolloFederationDriverConfig>({
   driver: ApolloFederationDriver,
   autoSchemaFile: 'apps/users-application/src/schema.gql',
+  playground: true,
+  context: ({ req }) => ({ req }),
+  buildSchemaOptions: {
+    orphanedTypes: [],
+  },
   plugins: [ApolloServerPluginInlineTrace()],
 }),

18-18: Consider environment-specific tracing configuration.

The inline trace plugin is enabled globally. Consider making it configurable based on the environment.

+ // TODO: Make tracing configurable based on environment
  plugins: [
-   ApolloServerPluginInlineTrace()
+   process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production'
+     ? ApolloServerPluginInlineTrace({
+         // Add production-specific options
+         generateClientInfo: ({ request }) => {
+           return {
+             clientName: request.headers['apollo-client-name'],
+             clientVersion: request.headers['apollo-client-version'],
+           };
+         },
+       })
+     : ApolloServerPluginInlineTrace()
  ],
apps/users-application/src/users/users.service.spec.ts (4)

1-3: Consider organizing imports by external/internal dependencies.

For better maintainability, consider grouping imports:

  1. External dependencies (@nestjs)
  2. Internal modules (services, models)
 import { Test, TestingModule } from '@nestjs/testing';
+
 import { UsersService } from './users.service';
 import { User } from './models/user.model';

5-14: Add explicit type annotation for better type safety.

The service variable declaration could benefit from explicit typing.

 describe('UsersService', () => {
-  let service: UsersService;
+  let service: UsersService | undefined;

16-18: Enhance service existence test with additional assertions.

While checking if the service is defined is good, consider adding assertions for the service's essential properties and methods.

 it('should be defined', () => {
   expect(service).toBeDefined();
+  expect(service.findById).toBeDefined();
+  expect(typeof service.findById).toBe('function');
 });

1-29: Consider architectural improvements for production readiness.

As this is part of a GraphQL federation setup, consider the following architectural improvements:

  1. Mock any future database dependencies using NestJS's custom providers
  2. Add tests for GraphQL-specific concerns (field resolvers, federation directives)
  3. Consider adding integration tests for federation scenarios

Example implementation for database mocking:

const mockUsersRepository = {
  findOne: jest.fn(),
  // Add other repository methods
};

describe('UsersService', () => {
  beforeEach(async () => {
    const module: TestingModule = await Test.createTestingModule({
      providers: [
        UsersService,
        {
          provide: 'UsersRepository',
          useValue: mockUsersRepository,
        },
      ],
    }).compile();
    // ...
  });
  // ...
});
apps/users-application/src/users/users.resolver.spec.ts (2)

6-25: Consider expanding the mock implementation.

While the current mock covers findById, consider adding comprehensive mocking for all service methods, including error scenarios. This ensures complete test coverage and helps catch edge cases.

 useValue: {
   findById: jest.fn(),
+  // Add other service methods
+  create: jest.fn(),
+  update: jest.fn(),
+  delete: jest.fn(),
 },

27-29: Consider adding more initialization tests.

While testing resolver definition is good, consider adding tests to verify:

  • Service injection
  • Resolver configuration (if any)
  • GraphQL field definitions
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dbc26a4 and c0e9fe3.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • .vscode/settings.json (1 hunks)
  • apps/users-application/src/app/app.module.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/users-application/src/users/models/user.model.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/users-application/src/users/users.module.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/users-application/src/users/users.resolver.spec.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/users-application/src/users/users.resolver.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/users-application/src/users/users.service.spec.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/users-application/src/users/users.service.ts (1 hunks)
  • package.json (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .vscode/settings.json
🔇 Additional comments (14)
apps/users-application/src/users/models/user.model.ts (2)

1-1: LGTM! Imports are correctly specified.

All necessary GraphQL decorators are imported from @nestjs/graphql.


3-4: Federation setup looks good, but verify the complete implementation.

The federation key directive is correctly configured using the id field. This is essential for entity resolution across the federated graph.

Let's verify the complete federation setup:

✅ Verification successful

Federation setup is correctly implemented

The verification confirms that:

  • The User model correctly defines the id field that matches the @key directive
  • The federation driver is properly configured in the users module using ApolloFederationDriver
  • The User model is properly decorated for federation with both @ObjectType() and @Directive('@key(fields: "id")')
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify federation setup across the application
# Check for federation gateway configuration and other federated services

# Test 1: Check for federation gateway setup
echo "Checking for federation gateway configuration..."
rg -l "ApolloGateway|@apollo/gateway" --type ts

# Test 2: Check for other federated services
echo "Checking for other federated services..."
rg -l "@Directive\\('@key" --type ts

# Test 3: Verify federation module configuration
echo "Checking for federation module setup..."
rg "GraphQLFederationModule" --type ts -A 5

Length of output: 475


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the federation setup more thoroughly

# Check for GraphQL Module configuration in the application
echo "Checking GraphQL module configuration..."
rg "GraphQLModule.forRoot" -A 10 --type ts

# Check if the User model has the 'id' field referenced in @key directive
echo "Checking User model implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class User {
  $$$
  id: $_
  $$$
}'

# Check for federation-related dependencies in package.json
echo "Checking federation dependencies..."
cat package.json | grep -A 5 -B 5 "@apollo/federation"

# Look for any federation configuration files
echo "Looking for federation config files..."
fd -e ts -e js -e json federation

Length of output: 1205


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the User model implementation directly and verify dependencies in package.json

# Check the complete User model implementation
echo "Checking complete User model..."
cat apps/users-application/src/users/models/user.model.ts

# Check package.json for all Apollo-related dependencies
echo "Checking Apollo dependencies..."
cat apps/users-application/src/package.json | jq '.dependencies'

Length of output: 540

apps/users-application/src/app/app.module.ts (2)

5-5: Verify the relative import path.

The import path ../users/users.module suggests the users module is at the same level as the app directory. Let's verify this structure is correct.

✅ Verification successful

Import path '../users/users.module' is correctly structured

The verification confirms that:

  • The file exists at apps/users-application/src/users/users.module.ts
  • The relative import path ../users/users.module from apps/users-application/src/app/app.module.ts correctly points to this location
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and location of UsersModule
# Expected: Find the users.module.ts file in the correct location

# Check if the file exists at the expected location
fd --type f "users.module.ts" apps/users-application/src/

# Verify the module exports
ast-grep --pattern 'export class UsersModule {}'

Length of output: 157


8-8: LGTM! Verify GraphQL federation setup.

The UsersModule is correctly imported and added to the module's imports array. However, let's verify that the UsersModule is properly configured for GraphQL federation.

✅ Verification successful

GraphQL federation is properly configured ✅

The federation setup is correctly implemented with:

  • ApolloFederationDriver configured in UsersModule
  • User model decorated with @Directive('@key(fields: "id")')
  • ResolveReference implementation in UsersResolver for federation lookups
  • Appropriate GraphQL decorators and types used throughout
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify GraphQL federation setup in UsersModule
# Expected: Find federation-specific decorators and configurations

# Look for federation setup in UsersModule
rg -l "ApolloFederationDriver|buildFederatedSchema" apps/users-application/src/

# Check for @Key decorator usage in User entity
ast-grep --pattern '@Key($$$) class User'

Length of output: 174


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual federation setup in the UsersModule
cat apps/users-application/src/users/users.module.ts

# Also check for any User entity definitions
fd User.ts -t f --exec cat {}

Length of output: 746


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the resolver and any entity definitions
cat apps/users-application/src/users/users.resolver.ts

# Also check for any GraphQL schema definitions
fd ".graphql" -t f --exec cat {}

Length of output: 686


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the User model definition
cat apps/users-application/src/users/models/user.model.ts

# Also check if there's a schema.gql file that might have been generated
fd "schema.gql" --exec cat {}

Length of output: 289

apps/users-application/src/users/users.service.ts (3)

1-2: LGTM!

The imports are correctly defined and necessary for the service implementation.


11-13: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance error handling and type safety.

The current implementation has potential issues:

  1. No validation for invalid number conversions
  2. No explicit error handling for non-existent users

Consider implementing this improved version:

-  findById(id: number): User | undefined {
-    return this.users.find((user) => user.id === Number(id));
+  findById(id: number | string): User | undefined {
+    const numericId = typeof id === 'string' ? Number(id) : id;
+    if (isNaN(numericId)) {
+      throw new Error('Invalid user ID format');
+    }
+    const user = this.users.find((user) => user.id === numericId);
+    return user;
+  }

This change:

  • Handles both number and string inputs (common in GraphQL)
  • Validates numeric conversion
  • Makes the code more defensive and explicit

Let's check how this method is used in resolvers:


4-9: Consider externalizing user data management.

While hardcoded data is acceptable for initial testing, consider implementing a more maintainable solution:

  1. Move user data to a configuration file or environment variables for easier updates
  2. Implement a proper database integration for production use
  3. Add data validation for user properties

This is particularly important in a federation setup where the Users service will be a source of truth for user data.

Let's check if there are any database configurations already in place:

apps/users-application/src/users/users.resolver.ts (1)

1-4: LGTM! Imports are well-organized and complete.

All necessary GraphQL federation decorators and dependencies are properly imported.

apps/users-application/src/users/users.module.ts (2)

1-10: LGTM! All necessary imports for federation are present.

The imports are well-organized and include all required dependencies for GraphQL federation setup.


11-13: LGTM! Module structure follows NestJS best practices.

The providers array correctly includes both UsersResolver and UsersService.

package.json (2)

19-20: LGTM! NestJS core packages are properly aligned.

All NestJS packages are on the same version (10.4.7), which is good for compatibility.

Also applies to: 22-22


23-23: LGTM! Utility packages are up to date.

The updated versions of axios, reflect-metadata, and rxjs are compatible with the new NestJS version.

Also applies to: 27-28

apps/users-application/src/users/users.resolver.spec.ts (2)

1-5: LGTM! Imports are well-organized.

The imports are clean, complete, and follow standard conventions.


1-64: Verify federation setup configuration.

Since this is part of a GraphQL federation implementation, ensure that:

  • Federation directives are properly configured
  • Reference resolution aligns with federation specifications
  • Service is properly registered in the federation gateway
✅ Verification successful

Federation setup is properly configured

The federation implementation is correctly set up with all required components:

  • User model is properly decorated with @Directive('@key(fields: "id")') for federation
  • resolveReference method is correctly implemented in the resolver
  • Federation driver is configured in the module with ApolloFederationDriver
  • Apollo tracing plugin is enabled for federation debugging
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for federation configuration
echo "Checking federation configuration..."
rg --type typescript "extend type" apps/
rg --type typescript "@key|@external|@requires|@provides" apps/

Length of output: 261


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for federation configuration with correct file extensions
echo "Checking federation configuration..."
# Look for federation-specific decorators and type extensions
rg -t ts "@Key|@External|@Requires|@Provides|extend type" apps/

# Look for federation module imports and setup
rg -t ts "@apollo/federation|buildFederatedSchema" apps/

# Check resolver implementation
cat apps/users-application/src/users/users.resolver.ts

Length of output: 859


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check user model for federation decorators
cat apps/users-application/src/users/models/user.model.ts

# Check GraphQL module setup
rg -t ts "GraphQLModule.forRoot" apps/

# Check main.ts for federation setup
cat apps/users-application/src/main.ts

Length of output: 1006


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check users module configuration
cat apps/users-application/src/users/users.module.ts

# Check applications config for federation setup
rg -t ts "userSubGraph" -A 5 -B 5 libs/applications-config/

Length of output: 838

apps/users-application/src/users/users.resolver.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
apps/users-application/src/users/users.module.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
apps/users-application/src/users/users.module.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
package.json Show resolved Hide resolved
package.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@zhumeisongsong zhumeisongsong changed the title ✨ Initial graphql federation ✨ Initial graphql federation: users application Nov 8, 2024
@zhumeisongsong zhumeisongsong merged commit 1af6fd8 into main Nov 8, 2024
5 checks passed
@zhumeisongsong zhumeisongsong deleted the feature/initial-graphql-federation branch November 8, 2024 03:47
@zhumeisongsong zhumeisongsong changed the title ✨ Initial graphql federation: users application feat: ✨ Initial graphql federation: users application Nov 13, 2024
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.0.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant